Albert Trummer, the owner of the popular celebrity hotspot DOM, is currently embroiled in a legal battle with his investor Arndt Oesterle. Oesterle has accused Trummer of overseeing a “live sex show” and allowing open drug use at the venue. In response, Trummer has vehemently denied these allegations, stating that it is all a ploy by Oesterle to take over his club.
According to Trummer, Oesterle threatened him last year after he refused to sign an agreement that would have made him the sole proprietor of the Gramercy Park spot. Trummer claims that Oesterle’s ultimate goal is to obtain control of his intellectual property and push him out of the business. He has described the lawsuit as an attempt to tarnish his reputation and seize control of DOM.
Denials and Defenses
Trummer has refuted the allegations made by Oesterle, arguing that there is no concrete evidence to support them. He has denied any involvement in live sex shows at DOM, emphasizing that the venue is not akin to the controversial Lower East Side club known for its racy burlesque shows. Trummer has expressed his intention to fight back against the accusations with the help of his legal team and has dismissed the claims as baseless.
Oesterle claims to have provided significant financial contributions to DOM, totaling approximately $1.8 million. However, Trummer disputes Oesterle’s assertion that he is a co-owner of the club. Trummer alleges that Oesterle only invested in specific assets, such as a sound system and furniture, which he later reclaimed. Trummer maintains that Oesterle’s investments were not directly tied to ownership of the business and asserts that the lawsuit is a result of personal vendetta rather than legitimate grievances.
Trummer has expressed his dismay at the allegations made by Oesterle, stating that it is hurtful and disrespectful, especially coming from someone he has known for 20 years. He has characterized the lawsuit as malicious and unfounded, vowing to challenge the claims in court. Trummer has warned Oesterle against making baseless accusations and has emphasized that he will not back down in defending his reputation and the integrity of DOM.
The legal battle between Albert Trummer and Arndt Oesterle is a complex and contentious dispute that has far-reaching implications for both parties. As the case progresses, it remains to be seen how the allegations and counterclaims will be resolved in a court of law. Despite the ongoing legal challenges, DOM continues to operate, providing a glimmer of hope amidst the turmoil surrounding its ownership.